Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: Rahul R Pawar, Kishor Mahajan, Tushar A Koli
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.63255
Certificate: View Certificate
As technological advancements progress, the energy demands of communities see a corresponding rise. The fulfilment of this energy need is achieved by several energy sources often referred to as conventional energy sources, including coal, fossil fuels, geothermal energy, hydroelectric power, and nuclear energy. These energy sources possess certain drawbacks. The first trio of these energy sources have finite lifespans. The use of hydraulic energy as an energy source is deemed inadequate, whereas nuclear energy presents unresolved concerns pertaining to both environmental impact and safety. Consequently, the scholars have focused their investigations on novel forms of sustainable energy sources often referred to as renewable energy sources. Solar energy is classified as a kind of sustainable energy source. Solar energy refers to the electromagnetic radiation generated by the process of nuclear fusion occurring inside the innermost region of the sun. The sun is responsible for the majority of the heat and light that the Earth gets, hence supporting the existence of all living organisms.
I. INTRODUCTION
Several years ago, a solar pond system was developed and evaluated via an undergraduate project. The construction of the system included the utilization of ferrocement. However, many drawbacks were observed in the system, including insufficient insulation of the side walls, absence of measures to mitigate convection and radiation heat loss to the surrounding air from the top surface, and a limited lifespan of the absorber surface covering. The primary aim of this study is to enhance the performance of the solar pond by addressing the aforementioned constraints and conducting a comparative analysis with its predecessor. In this study, a series of measures were undertaken to account for several aspects that influence the performance of solar ponds, including water turbidity, bottom reflectivity, and heat insulation, among others. To enhance the thermal capacity of the absorber surface, a novel coating with improved durability was used, surpassing the performance of the coating utilised in prior research. There are now two distinct kinds of coatings that are readily accessible on the market: epoxy coating and synthetic enamel paint with a matte finish. The first option has superior qualities, but at a disproportionately high cost. The latter refers to a specific form of cement paint that has exceptional adhesive properties. The product is offered in two distinct finishes, namely glossy and matte, and is capable of adhering to all sorts of primers [4]. In order to mitigate water turbidity, convection, and radiation heat loss to the surrounding air, a transparent cover was used to enhance the effectiveness of the pond
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
Mohammad Reza Assari, Hassan Basirat Tabrizi, Alireza Jafar Gholi Beik carry out an experiment to examine the impact of incorporating phase change material (PCM) into a tiny salinity-gradient solar pond on its performance.[1] In this experiment, the process of extracting heat from the ponds was conducted in the Local Climate Zone (LCZ) on July 24th. The temperature of the incoming water was maintained at a constant value of 350C while it passed through a water storage tank and a pump discharge rate of 68 mL/s (equivalent to 67.7 g/s). The density of the substance, denoted as q, is measured to be 995.7 kg/m3 at a temperature of 30°C, as seen in Figure 2.1. Regarding the pond, In the absence of phase change material (PCM) during the first stages of the extraction process, the liquid chromatography zone (LCZ) and the exit. The water temperatures recorded were 62 °C and 50 °C, respectively. Following a duration of 20 minutes, the temperature of the LCZ experienced a decline to 58°C, while the output water temperature concurrently attained a value of 45°C. Nevertheless, In the case of the pond using phase change material (PCM), the initial temperature of the liquid cooling zone (LCZ) was recorded at 58°C and stayed consistent throughout the duration of the experiment, but the temperature of the water at the exit varied. A. Ramalingam and S. Arumugam conducted both experimental and theoretical studies on the variations in the specific heat capacity of NaCl salt solution at various temperatures and concentrations. It has been seen that sodium chloride (NaCl) solution is often used in the heat storage zone (HSZ) of salt gradient solar ponds (SGSP). The concentrations of this solution typically range from 20% to 25% (weight percentage). Its primary purpose is to facilitate the capture and storage of solar energy, which may later be retrieved as thermal energy. A range of NaCl solutions, varying in concentration from 25% to 0%, have been used to establish a salinity gradient known as the non-convecting zone (NCZ). These NCZs are layered above the high-salinity zone (HSZ) inside a salinity gradient solar pond (SGSP). The less dense layer is positioned over the heavier layer by maintaining their relative positions. The primary objective of establishing a salinity gradient is to mitigate convective heat loss from the Heat Storage Zone (HSZ) by inhibiting convection resulting from solar heating. They have derived a best-fit relationship for estimating the specific heat capacity that is suitable for SGSP (solar-generated steam production) applications. This relationship is specifically applicable to NaCl brine with concentrations ranging from 20% to 26% and temperatures ranging from 57°C to 75°C. The concentration and temperature ranges mentioned are typically found in the brine environment of the heat storage zone in any SGSP.
III. METHODOLOGY
In this section, we outline the methodology employed in the project, "Enhancing Solar Pond Performance Through Innovative Design and Advanced Thermal Energy Management." The methodology encompasses the steps and procedures undertaken to construct, modify, and evaluate the solar pond system, focusing on improvements in energy efficiency and temperature stability.
V. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
TABLE I
Without PCM and TES
TABLE 7.1: ENERGY STORE IN SOLAR POND WITHOUT PCM AND TES
Days |
Energy store Solar pond Q=m.Cp.(TLCZ-Ta) |
01-06-2022 |
105.17 |
02-06-2022 |
112.30 |
03-06-2022 |
99.49 |
04-06-2022 |
121.13 |
05-06-2022 |
110.43 |
With TES
Table 7.2: Energy store in Solar pond With TES
Days |
Energy store Solar pond Q=m.Cp.(TLCZ-Ta) |
06-06-2022 |
174.66 |
07-06-2022 |
185.19 |
08-06-2022 |
178.95 |
09-06-2022 |
178.95 |
10-06-2022 |
189.48 |
With PCM
Table 7.3: Energy store in Solar pond With PCM
Days |
Energy store Solar pond Q=m.Cp.(TLCZ-Ta) |
11-06-2022 |
169.88 |
12-06-2022 |
147.43 |
13-06-2022 |
146.87 |
14-06-2022 |
155.26 |
15-06-2022 |
168.63 |
Overall result of LCZ temperature
Table 7.4: Overall result of LCZ temperature
Days |
Without TES & PCM |
TES |
PCM |
1 |
49.18 |
57.21 |
53.52 |
2 |
49.71 |
58.23 |
52.78 |
3 |
47.36 |
58.33 |
54.2 |
4 |
50.92 |
58.33 |
54.41 |
5 |
50.44 |
57.36 |
54.34 |
AVG. |
49.522 |
57.892 |
53.85 |
|
|
|
|
Following tables illustrate the temperature changes for three separate zones for made-up solar pond models. While alterations in solar radiation were seen between 830 and 970 W/m2 , variations in ambient temperature were seen between 30 to 40°C. The readings were taken from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. at regular intervals of one hour and shown on the average basis values of ambient conditions for the specific day as part of all the experiments for performance evaluation of the solar pond model in the climatic conditions of Jalgaon (425001). A solar pond model's thermal performance has been studied. The performance testing is carried out in the month of June 2022. According to, dated March 6, 2022, the temperatures exhibit a marginal increase in comparison to the first day. Temperature rises are seen in all zones. The LCZ experiences its peak temperature around 2:00 PM, reaching a maximum of 57.4°C. The mean temperatures recorded in the UCZ, NCZ, and LCZ are 33.28°C, 36.3°C, and 47.36°C, respectively. According to, dated April 6, 2022, the temperatures recorded at 9:00 AM exhibit a resemblance to those seen on preceding days. The temperatures in urban and rural areas see a notable increase during the course of the day. The LCZ has the maximum recorded temperature of 60°C at 2:00 PM. The mean temperatures recorded are as follows: UCZ (Urban Core Zone) with an average temperature of 33.23°C, NCZ (Neighbouring Core Zone) with an average temperature of 35.76°C, and LCZ (Peripheral Core Zone) with an average temperature of 50.92°C. May 6, 2022, the temperatures observed at 9:00 a.m. exhibit variation across different zones. The temperatures in UCZ and NCZ see a dramatic increase during the course of the day. The LCZ has the maximum recorded temperature of 60.4°C at 2:00 PM. The mean temperatures for UCZ, NCZ, and LCZ are 34.23°C, 35.67°C, and 50.44°C, respectively. Across general, temperatures tend to rise during the day across all geographical regions. The LCZ has a propensity for experiencing elevated temperatures, which may be attributed to its relatively lower elevation, facilitating the accumulation of heat. The temperatures in UCZ and NCZ see an increase, but to a lesser extent compared to the more pronounced rise observed in LCZ. There is observable variability in average temperatures throughout different days and geographical zones. In results, the data presented in this study illustrates the fluctuations in temperature seen throughout several zones inside a solar pond over a span of numerous days. The temperature patterns seen in the pond are controlled by several variables, including sun radiation, heat buildup, and heat transport processes. It is essential to acknowledge that the present research only covers a limited duration, hence necessitating a more extensive investigation to ascertain long-term patterns and identify particular components that contribute to temperature changes. Furthermore, the lack of thermal energy storage (TES) and phase change materials (PCM) might potentially result in decreased effectiveness in the storage and transport of heat inside the solar pond.
VI. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I sincerely thanks to my guide for his valuable suggestion during my project work. I wish to express my sincere gratitude to for his cooperation encouragement. Gracious gratitude to all the faculty of the Department of physics, friends, for their valuable advices, encouragement. My special gratitude to all researchers for their inspiration, cooperation, encouragement invaluable guidance during the progress of project work in all phases. Also, the project works impossible to complete without non-teaching staff of Physics department. Last but not the least to express our highest gratitude to my parents for their energetic moral, economical support to that boosted my moral. It is because of them I have reached the place where I am today.
Solar pond was constructed in which three modifications were made. Transparent cover was placed over the system, cork sheet was used as insulator for the side walls and special type of absorber surface coating was used. The present work shows better output than the previous work. In the previous work, minimum temperature obtained at the LCZ was 30oC whereas the maximum temperature obtained in the present work is 70.2oC. Temperature difference between UCZ and LCZ was 6oC in the previous work where 27oC temperature difference between UCZ and LCZ was obtained in the present work. Increased lifetime of the solar pond is expected because of insulation provided at the bottom and absorber coating used are of better quality. The \"Design, Fabrication, and Experimental Investigation for Stability of Solar Ponds Using TES and PCM\" project provides important insights into the dynamic interaction between thermal energy storage (TES) and phase change materials (PCM) inside a solar pond system. The five-day temperature data collection indicates unique trends: the integration of TES leads to higher average temperatures, highlighting its effectiveness in successfully storing and releasing thermal energy. In contrast, the presence of PCM causes temperatures to drop because the substance absorbs heat while going through a phase transition. These results show that TES and PCM have the potential to have a major impact on temperature stability and energy management in solar pond systems. The results of the experiment highlight the significance of thoughtful design decisions when attempting to improve temperature management and energy use in solar thermal applications. Further investigation into the solar pond\'s deeper levels and an examination of the system\'s long-term performance under various environmental factors may lead to more effective design methods and increased energy efficiency.
[1] Mohammad Reza Assari, Hassan Basirat Tabrizi, Alireza Jafar Gholi Beik.: “Experimental studies on the effect of using phase change material in salinity-gradient solar pond”, Solar Energy 122, 204–214, (2015). [2] A. Ramalingam, S. Arumugam.: “Experimental Study on Specific Heat of Hot Brine for Salt Gradient Solar Pond Application”, International Journal of ChemTech Research, Volume 4, Issue 3, 956-961, JulySept 2012. [3] Karakavalasa Goutham, Chukka Siva Krishna.: “Solar Pond Technology”, International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science, Volume 1, Issue 2, December 2013. [4] Abhishek Saxena, Varun Goel.: “A Technical Note on Fabrication and Thermal Performance Studies of a Solar Pond Model”, Journal of Renewable Energy, (2013). [5] Huanmin Lu, John C. Walton, Andrew H.P. Swift.: “Desalination coupled with salinity-gradient solar ponds”, Elsevier (Desalination) 136, 13-23, (2001). [6] J. Wang, J. Seyed-Yagoobi.: “Effect of Water Turbidity on Thermal Performance of a Salt-Gradient Solar Pond”, Solar Energy, Volume 54, Issue No. 5, 301-308, (1995). [7] Nuri Ozek, Mehmet Karakilcik, Nalan Cicek Bezir.: “A Solar Pond Model with Insulated and Glass Covered Surface (IGCSP)”, Bulgarian Journal of Physics 27, Issue No. 4, 67-70, (2000). [8] Muhammad Tawalbeh, Rana Muhammad Nauman Javed, Amani Al-Othman.: “Fares Almomani Salinity gradient solar ponds hybrid systems for power generation and water desalination”, Energy Conversion and Management, Volume 289, 1 August 2023. [9] Rudhrala Sivaprasad, B. Srinivasarao.: “Experimental Investigation of Solar Pond Integrated with PCM Storage”, International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology, Volume 5, Issue 1, 208-212, June 2018. [10] G.R. Ramakrishna Murthy, K.P. Pandey.: “Solar Ponds- A Perspective from Indian Agriculture”, Department of Agricultural and Food Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur-721302, India. [11] Velmurugan V, Srithar K.; “Prospects and scopes of solar pond: A detailed review”, Renew Sustain Energy Rev (2007). [ [12] Er. R. K. Rajput, Heat and Mass Transfer, Sixth Edition 2015, S. Chand Publication, New Delhi
Copyright © 2024 Rahul R Pawar, Kishor Mahajan, Tushar A Koli. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET63255
Publish Date : 2024-06-11
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here